Fatal_Papercut
Member

Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Oct 09, 2010, 08:45:54 am » |
|
Thanks for the replies.
I did purchase the 480, and so far, things are looking great. All of those black borders have disappeared, and I am pleasantly surprised to find that there is a very noticeable performance increase across the board in my most demanding games. Release reviews had led me to believe that the performance gains would be minimal, although Nvidia has now had a few months to tweak the drivers (I am currently running the latest beta drivers).
Most notable so far is Metro 2033; it looked great on the 5870, but it was unplayable (22 fps) on max settings @ 1920x1080 (my CPU is an AMD Phenom II X4 965, stock 3.4GHz, OCed to 3.8GHz). It now runs smooth as melting butter. I also noticed that Batman: Arkham Asylum runs better WITH PhysX features turned on than it did with the 5870 (and no PhysX, of course).
In regards to that 5870, believe me, I tried every setting under the sun. I had to keep a notepad filled with all of the various combinations of settings that I had tried: GPU scaling on/off, pixel ratios, overscan settings, etc. Nothing ever fixed the problem, and the ATI/AMD forums are overflowing with people having the exact same problem. I guess ATI should have checked to make certain that their cards worked on HDTVs before naming the card series "HD".
I had always purchased Nvidia cards in the past simply because, at the time I was shopping for a GPU, they had the best cards on the market (I always go for the high-end stuff). The 5870 was top-dog when it came out, so I went with that. If I was playing games on my 24" display instead of a 42" HDTV, I probably would have kept my 5870 until the next-gen came out (again, I was only having these problems on my HDTV). Now I have learned my lesson.
As it stands now, I'm very happy with the 480, and I will likely skip a generation of GPUs before I consider upgrading again.
Or maybe I'll just buy an Xbox. If that happens, I'd appreciate it if one of you would shoot me.
|